Amritsari fish vs mutton keema: calories and protein compared
Short answer: for fat loss pick amritsari fish; for muscle gain mutton keema does more. The numbers are per usual serving, so check the serving sizes in the table.
| Per serving | Amritsari fish | Mutton keema |
|---|---|---|
| Serving | 1 plate | 1 katori · 180 g |
| Calories | 336 kcal | 354 kcal |
| Protein | 24 g | 22 g |
| Carbs | 15 g | 5 g |
| Fat | 20 g | 26 g |
| Protein per 100 kcal | 7 g | 6.3 g |
| Calories from fat | 54% | 67% |
What the numbers say
- Mutton keema has 18 kcal more a serving than amritsari fish. One serving of mutton keema has the calories of about 1.1 servings of amritsari fish.
- Amritsari fish has more protein: 24 g vs 22 g.
- For protein per calorie, amritsari fish wins with 7 g per 100 kcal.
Which to pick
- Losing fat: Amritsari fish, because it gives more protein for each calorie, which keeps you full and protects muscle.
- Building muscle: Mutton keema, because it brings more energy for training with similar protein.
- Either way: the cooking fat moves both numbers most. Halving the oil or ghee is the easiest cut.